Back to Resource Hub

Voltage isn’t a Guidance -It’s a Statutory Limit. Reflections from VMF Q1.

Our Voltage Matters Forum (Q1 2026) held on 23 January 2026 made one thing clear: The UK grid is currently being managed with conservative, analogue assumptions that are no longer fit for a digital, high-LCT age.

We brought together a formidable lineup of experts to dissect the “Resilience Gap” in our grid. Here is the engineering reality:

1. The Macro Warning: Voltage is the New Inertia

Kathryn Porter’s (Watt-Logic) pre-recorded presentation provided a stark reminder that while “Reactive Power” is a useful mathematical abstraction, only current and voltage are real, controllable elements. Following the Iberian blackout in 2025, Kathryn highlighted the “Analogue vs. Digital” gap: synchronous machines “snap back” via physics, while inverters must “measure, decide, and act.” In a low-inertia grid, that delay is the difference between stability and collapse.

2. The Proof: Active Management is Scalable

Ramy Ali (ESB Networks) showcased the first European deployment of the IEEE 2030.5 protocol for rooftop PV. The technical proof is irrefutable: control gateways were installed in under 30 minutes per site, proving that we can monitor and control distributed resources at scale. The technology exists—the only thing missing is the regulatory mandate to roll it out.

3. The IDNO “Coal Face”: Trapped at the Top

Joseph Nolan (GTC) shared a troubling trend for new housing developments. Many IDNO networks are already on their lowest possible transformer tap, yet customers are still seeing 253V+ due to upstream grid pressure. This results in EV chargers tripping and solar inverters disconnecting. As Joseph noted, 75% of voltage complaints result in “no action” because the hardware range is simply exhausted.

4. The Policy Bridge: The OC6 Risk

James Bamborough (IET) detailed the work of the IET Voltage Management Working Group. Our live Slido polling confirmed James’s concerns: 85% of monitored primary substations are operating with less than 4 taps of downward range remaining. This doesn’t just block PV connections; it potentially compromises statutory compliance (OC6) during system emergencies.

5. Breaking the Silos & The “Robot Apocalypse” The forum identified a “Confidence Gap.” Network operations are overwhelmed by data and a fear that autonomous solutions (the “robot apocalypse”) will replace human control. However,supply chain partners are ready to deliver “whole system” performance that bridges the silos between meter operators and networks. We must trust automation to manage the millions of new control points that human engineers simply cannot.

The £1.5 Billion Prize

The business case for the “Voltage Grand Slam” is proven.

  • Bills: 1% voltage reduction = 1.2% bill saving (£1.5bn/year across GB).
  • Capacity: Monitoring and control can deliver a massive boost in network hosting capacity without digging up roads.
  • Resilience: You get the “Insurance Policy” of grid stability for free when you buy the commercial benefits.

The Bottom Line:

We cannot expect customers to pay for a system that is less efficient and less secure than it could be. We need engineering technical capability to lead the way over “economist purism.”